Inexact Possibilities: Politics at the Cutting Edge
Heaven Forbid Journalists Report Facts
Barrett Brown wrote a lengthy and hilarious post over at Vanity Fair about conservative reaction to Michael Hastings’ blockbuster Rolling Stone piece that brought down McChrystal. Couched in an attack on National Review (too easy!), it’s a rather damning indictment of the media in general. To wit:
Unlike many of this country’s most respected commentators, Hastings did not spend the better part of a decade repeating conventional wisdom about our allegedly unprecedented success in two wars that have already proven to be abject failures, and thus he has no reason to simply take the word of some or another confused presidential administration that everything is under control, or will be after some additional expenditure of blood and treasure.
Another taste, for color:
I myself am a subscriber [of National Review] and find myself constantly distracted by the ads, many of which are written to look like articles and which routinely conjure up dubious global financial entities in order to convince the publication’s readers to buy coins in exchange for some unspecified number of payments in order that they might also receive a free safe. Advertisers know their audience, naturally.
Read the whole thing.
June 25th, 2010 at 3:38 pm
The journalistic ethos in this country is bankrupt. Hastings is not a “mainstream” reporter because he actually reported the idiocy spouted by his subject rather than being “discreet” in the interest of preserving a source. And in fact that seems what most large media outlet reporters seem to value most — access to sources. They’d prefer this access to the hard work of actual reporting, and so they keep hidden what really matters. And the likes of David Brooks, today, cry that doing otherwise elevates mere “kvetching” it offenses that get generals fired:
By putting the kvetching in the magazine, the reporter essentially took run-of-the-mill complaining and turned it into a direct challenge to presidential authority. He took a successful general and made it impossible for President Obama to retain him.
“The reticent ethos had its flaws. But the exposure ethos, with its relentless emphasis on destroying privacy and exposing impurities, has chased good people from public life, undermined public faith in institutions and elevated the trivial over the important.
“Another scalp is on the wall. Government officials will erect even higher walls between themselves and the outside world. The honest and freewheeling will continue to flee public life, and the cautious and calculating will remain.”
July 15th, 2010 at 8:13 am
Amazing post thank you!
Sent via Blackberry