A good knight’s work

Barack Obama seems to be setting a good example of not letting fear stymie creativity.

In his speech to Congress last night, the U.S.president countered the absurd rumors circulating about health-care reforms (death panels, incipient communism) by bluntly calling them what they are: lies. He also made it pretty clear that he’s not going to cave on the innovative elements he wants to see in a revised health-insurance program, such as a “marketplace” of insurance options, including government-sponsored plans, for individuals and employers of varying means to choose from. He also pointed out – not insultingly, but unmistakably – that supporters of the Bush administration are in no position to question the cost of providing health care to the American people when they’re the ones who overwhelmingly supported spending billions on the Iraq war and cutting taxes for the extremely rich.

It was a speech that rode in, took an unshakable moral and policy stance and delivered knockout offensive blows while simultaneously conveying fresh ideas and the hope and expectation that  left and right will unite in an effort to think up even more.  

Whether or not you like the ideas or Obama himself, you’d have a hard time claiming that it wasn’t a bold speech. And boldness – guts, spine, heart and brains – is what we need more of in our thinking and our actions. It takes courage to invent new ways of solving our problems, but it take even more to make sure the best ones are put to use, in spite of other people’s reluctance, resentment, knee-jerk opposition and attempts at sabotage .

P.S. And how nice to see a president act boldly in the interest of actually helping people. Maybe before Obama’s term is up, all of us will be able to afford annual check-ups.

President plugs creativity

From Barack Obama’s address to Congress last night:

“The answers to our problems don’t lie beyond our reach. They exist in our laboratories and our universities, in our fields and our factories, in the imaginations of our entrepreneurs and the pride of the hardest-working people on Earth.”

And in our studios and rehearsal halls.

Divided we go bankrupt

The United States is big on individualism. In this country, we’re all raised with the idea that going our own way is our birthright, our mission – part of the iconic American dream in which we each create our own destiny, follow our own conscience and answer to no man. Or woman, especially the little kind. 

Hollywood movies have burned this into our brains as if our memories were DVDs: We aren’t supposed to follow. We’re all supposed to go out there, stake our own claim and start our own business, community, political movement, religion, band, micro-brewery, website.

Of course, you could well argue that all of us obeying this imperative is following, and major following of a particularly clueless, cowlike nature, too. But for the sake of a larger point, let’s say that we really are a nation of  god-damned independents.

So what happens when that irresistible, entrepreneurial spirit runs up against an immovable financial crisis like the one we’re in? The first thing to give out (besides our income …) has to be our vaunted go-it-aloneness.

That’s a hard fact the nonprofit world has been learning in recent years as subscriptions have fallen, along with corporate and private support. There just aren’t enough resources anymore to sustain the old way of operating solo, so nonprofits have started – suspiciously at first, but with increasing urgency – working together and sharing expenses.

The rest of us are going to have to do the same.

It’s not going to be enough just to pull together in spirit – though that would be helpful, too, and Barack Obama is good at engendering sentiments of unity, as he did again last night in his first official address to Congress. We Americans, who fancy ourselves as uncompromising hero-leaders along the lines of John Wayne and Iron Man Tony Stark, have got to start teaming up our efforts on all levels.

Look how much duplication exists in the marketplace and in government and in private life. The nearly obscene range of goods in our supermarkets ( 75 kinds of cereal?) makes immigrants from less indulgent lands cry. Our towns and cities pay enormous costs for separate services, from water and sewer to schools and security. About every third person – including me – wants to build his or her own little business empire or good-doing foundation.

How many individual film-production companies and clothing lines do we have in this country? How many people  separately collecting shoes for needy kids or money to cure particular diseases? How many software developers and yard-care companies and pizza parlors?

Doesn’t it seem like we could streamline some of  this bloat by joining forces with each other? Some efforts at efficiency have already begun – fusion marketing, (half-hearted) regionalism, shared office-supply purchasing - but we’re going have to get a lot more serious about it if we want to improve productivity, trim government waste, reduce our national debt and increase the success rate of small businesses.

I’m not talking about us surrendering our identities and becoming part of some unspeakably huge conglomerate. Just sharing and collaborating where that makes sense and strengthens us individually and collectively.  I don’t think we can afford not to anymore.

I mean, even John Wayne collaborated with other cowpokes once in a while – especially in a tight spot.