Peter Friedman
Associate Professor, Legal Analysis & Writing
Case Western Reserve University School of Law

Ruling Imagination: Law and Creativity

February 04th, 2010 | Free Speech, creative lawyering, fun, originality, trademark

The South Butt Answer to the North Face

For a brilliant combination of technical perfection, persuasion, and humor of a sort I’ve never before seen in an answer to a complaint, you’ve got to see the answer filed by South Butt to the complaint filed by North Face alleging that South Butt’s name and its slogan, “Never Stop Relaxing,” infringe North Face’s trademarks in its name and its own slogan, “Never Stop Exploring.” I will be forever grateful to techdirt for bringing this document to my attention.
The South Butt Answer to the North Face

This article has 1 comment

  1. DavidJacobstein Says:

    North Face’s counsel really needs to be very careful with their strategy and arguments so as not to directly insult their entire audience and customer base by asserting that they are likely be confused between Faces and their Butts…

    If you are likely to be confused between Face and Butt, then VF should be ok with losing the revenue associated with your purchase…IMHO.

Add a comment