<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Corporations = individuals? Confusions in economic theory and First Amendment jurisprudence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.geniocity.com/friedman/2010/01/corporations-individuals-confusions-in-economic-theory-and-first-amendment-jurisprudence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.geniocity.com/friedman/2010/01/corporations-individuals-confusions-in-economic-theory-and-first-amendment-jurisprudence/</link>
	<description>The ways law rules creative endeavors and the ways law itself is a creative endeavor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:08:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruling Imagination: Law and Creativity &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Confirmation Hearings for Supreme Court Nominees, Elena Kagan, and the mythical Borking of Robert Bork</title>
		<link>http://blogs.geniocity.com/friedman/2010/01/corporations-individuals-confusions-in-economic-theory-and-first-amendment-jurisprudence/comment-page-1/#comment-3507</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruling Imagination: Law and Creativity &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Confirmation Hearings for Supreme Court Nominees, Elena Kagan, and the mythical Borking of Robert Bork</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 23:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.geniocity.com/friedman/2010/01/corporations-individuals-confusions-in-economic-theory-and-first-amendment-jurisprudence/#comment-3507</guid>
		<description>[...] writing a concurring opinion in support of the Citizens United decision by the Supreme Court overturning precedent that had supported over 100 years of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] writing a concurring opinion in support of the Citizens United decision by the Supreme Court overturning precedent that had supported over 100 years of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruling Imagination: Law and Creativity &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What if corporate decision makers lost money when they made bad decisions?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.geniocity.com/friedman/2010/01/corporations-individuals-confusions-in-economic-theory-and-first-amendment-jurisprudence/comment-page-1/#comment-3364</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruling Imagination: Law and Creativity &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What if corporate decision makers lost money when they made bad decisions?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 19:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.geniocity.com/friedman/2010/01/corporations-individuals-confusions-in-economic-theory-and-first-amendment-jurisprudence/#comment-3364</guid>
		<description>[...] Supreme Court decision equating the free speech rights of corporations with those of individuals, I pointed out the insanity of considering corporate and other business entities as rational actors of the sort many economists consider people to be. The problem is that corporate decisions are made [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Supreme Court decision equating the free speech rights of corporations with those of individuals, I pointed out the insanity of considering corporate and other business entities as rational actors of the sort many economists consider people to be. The problem is that corporate decisions are made [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruling Imagination: Law and Creativity &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Archers Daniel Midland abuses copyright law to censor criticism &#8212; corporations have the right to free speech, but not the people who criticize them?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.geniocity.com/friedman/2010/01/corporations-individuals-confusions-in-economic-theory-and-first-amendment-jurisprudence/comment-page-1/#comment-3186</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruling Imagination: Law and Creativity &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Archers Daniel Midland abuses copyright law to censor criticism &#8212; corporations have the right to free speech, but not the people who criticize them?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 13:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.geniocity.com/friedman/2010/01/corporations-individuals-confusions-in-economic-theory-and-first-amendment-jurisprudence/#comment-3186</guid>
		<description>[...] corporations apparently believe in free speech for themselves but not for individuals. The first video below is a deadly dull piece of propagandistic pap in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] corporations apparently believe in free speech for themselves but not for individuals. The first video below is a deadly dull piece of propagandistic pap in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruling Imagination: Law and Creativity &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Chief Justice Roberts has no respect for precedent that doesn&#8217;t suit his purposes.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.geniocity.com/friedman/2010/01/corporations-individuals-confusions-in-economic-theory-and-first-amendment-jurisprudence/comment-page-1/#comment-3174</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruling Imagination: Law and Creativity &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Chief Justice Roberts has no respect for precedent that doesn&#8217;t suit his purposes.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 15:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.geniocity.com/friedman/2010/01/corporations-individuals-confusions-in-economic-theory-and-first-amendment-jurisprudence/#comment-3174</guid>
		<description>[...] of the less noticed parts of last week&#8217;s Citizens United decision by the Supreme Court overturning precedent that had supported over 100 years of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the less noticed parts of last week&#8217;s Citizens United decision by the Supreme Court overturning precedent that had supported over 100 years of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruling Imagination: Law and Creativity &#187; Blog Archive &#187; If a coroporation is a person, why is an animal no more than a chair?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.geniocity.com/friedman/2010/01/corporations-individuals-confusions-in-economic-theory-and-first-amendment-jurisprudence/comment-page-1/#comment-3172</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruling Imagination: Law and Creativity &#187; Blog Archive &#187; If a coroporation is a person, why is an animal no more than a chair?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.geniocity.com/friedman/2010/01/corporations-individuals-confusions-in-economic-theory-and-first-amendment-jurisprudence/#comment-3172</guid>
		<description>[...] light of the decision by the Supreme Court the other day in Citizens United regarding the rights of corporations to make campaign contributions without restriction, I felt [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] light of the decision by the Supreme Court the other day in Citizens United regarding the rights of corporations to make campaign contributions without restriction, I felt [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

