December 08th, 2009 | Law as a reflection of its society, problem solving, propaganda, regulation, rhetoric

Steven Levitt and Freakonomics can go to hell!

On Veterans Day I expressed my disgust and contempt for Steven Levitt (he of Freakonomics fame) because his devotion to intellectual abstraction divorced from any connection to reality is, well, disgusting and contemptuous. The specific reason for my post on that day was Levitt’s proposition that a military draft, in his words, “puts the ‘wrong’ people in the military.”  Bob Herbert today expands on the point:

The idea that fewer than 1 percent of Americans are being called on to fight in Afghanistan and Iraq and that we’re sending them into combat again and again and again — for three tours, four tours, five tours, six tours — is obscene. All decent people should object. . . .

The reason it is so easy for the U.S. to declare wars, and to continue fighting year after year after year, is because so few Americans feel the actual pain of those wars. We’ve been fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan longer than we fought in World Wars I and II combined. If voters had to choose right now between instituting a draft or exiting Afghanistan and Iraq, the troops would be out of those two countries in a heartbeat.

I don’t think our current way of waging war, which is pretty easy-breezy for most citizens, is what the architects of America had in mind. Here’s George Washington’s view, for example: “It must be laid down as a primary position and the basis of our system, that every citizen who enjoys the protection of a free government owes not only a proportion of his property, but even his personal service to the defense of it.”

This article has 1 comment

  1. David Allsebrook Says:

    The fewer people involved in waging an overseas war and suffering its consequences,the easier it is for a government to start and continue it. Sure it raises taxes and affects international relations,but these are abstracts to most citizens.
    If there were a fairly conducted draft, with no exemptions except for health or humanitarian reasons, and covering all genders and orientations up to age, say 45, then the war would touch every family more closely. The public interest in fighting it would be much more vocally discussed. The prospect of dying is said to focus the mind wonderfully.

Add a comment