<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How good a literary critic was the judge in the Catcher in the Rye case?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.geniocity.com/friedman/2009/07/how-good-a-literary-critic-was-the-judge-in-the-catcher-in-the-rye-case/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.geniocity.com/friedman/2009/07/how-good-a-literary-critic-was-the-judge-in-the-catcher-in-the-rye-case/</link>
	<description>The ways law rules creative endeavors and the ways law itself is a creative endeavor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:08:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruling Imagination: Law and Creativity &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What did Jackson Pollock intend when he painted Lavender Mist? Cariou v. Prince, and the importance of scripting the artist&#8217;s words.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.geniocity.com/friedman/2009/07/how-good-a-literary-critic-was-the-judge-in-the-catcher-in-the-rye-case/comment-page-1/#comment-5248</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruling Imagination: Law and Creativity &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What did Jackson Pollock intend when he painted Lavender Mist? Cariou v. Prince, and the importance of scripting the artist&#8217;s words.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.geniocity.com/friedman/?p=2618#comment-5248</guid>
		<description>[...] focus on artistic intention would impose on our appreciation of art?  Nevertheless, in the decision enjoining the publication of a “sequel” to The Catcher in the Rye, the judge was significantly influenced by the fact the author and his [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] focus on artistic intention would impose on our appreciation of art?  Nevertheless, in the decision enjoining the publication of a “sequel” to The Catcher in the Rye, the judge was significantly influenced by the fact the author and his [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruling Imagination: Law and Creativity &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Cariou v. Prince: the damage to plaintiff is far more important than Richard Prince&#8217;s inability to articulate an artistic intent.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.geniocity.com/friedman/2009/07/how-good-a-literary-critic-was-the-judge-in-the-catcher-in-the-rye-case/comment-page-1/#comment-4666</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruling Imagination: Law and Creativity &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Cariou v. Prince: the damage to plaintiff is far more important than Richard Prince&#8217;s inability to articulate an artistic intent.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.geniocity.com/friedman/?p=2618#comment-4666</guid>
		<description>[...] nature of alleged infringements on the avowed intentions of the artists themselves. Thus, in the decision enjoining the publication of a “sequel” to The Catcher in the Rye, the judge was significantly influenced by the fact the author and his [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] nature of alleged infringements on the avowed intentions of the artists themselves. Thus, in the decision enjoining the publication of a “sequel” to The Catcher in the Rye, the judge was significantly influenced by the fact the author and his [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruling Imagination: Law and Creativity &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Don&#8217;t forget to call your mashup a reflection and critique of the works it appropriates!</title>
		<link>http://blogs.geniocity.com/friedman/2009/07/how-good-a-literary-critic-was-the-judge-in-the-catcher-in-the-rye-case/comment-page-1/#comment-2613</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruling Imagination: Law and Creativity &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Don&#8217;t forget to call your mashup a reflection and critique of the works it appropriates!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.geniocity.com/friedman/?p=2618#comment-2613</guid>
		<description>[...] of the original, but doing so might be a little too blatant. It is plain that in the recent decision enjoining the publication of a &#8220;sequel&#8221; to The Catcher in the Rye, the judge was significantly influenced by the fact the author and his [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the original, but doing so might be a little too blatant. It is plain that in the recent decision enjoining the publication of a &#8220;sequel&#8221; to The Catcher in the Rye, the judge was significantly influenced by the fact the author and his [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

