Peter Friedman
Lawyer

View Peter Friedman's profile on LinkedIn

Ruling Imagination: Law and Creativity

February 02nd, 2012 | copyright, copyright and fair use, creativity, technology and law | Add your comment

Girl Talk: If they passed out paints on the street for free, I’m sure there’d be a lot more painters.

February 01st, 2012 | Art & Money, copyright, copyright and fair use | Add your comment

They’re trying to make it illegal for you to respond to the imagery your bombarded with every day.

From NEWSgrist comes the sad news of Mike Kelley’s death, along with a very interesting interview of Kelley conducted by Glenn O’Brien. An excerpt: GO:?I’ve remembered an event and thought I’d said something when actually it was somebody else who said it or vice versa. I think, especially in writing, so much of plagiarism is completely unconscious. MK:?I have experienced that often. I’ve stolen ideas, and people have stolen from Read more

January 31st, 2012 | fun | Add your comment

Mount Washington Railroad, New Hampshire (c. 1870)

GIF made with the NYPL Labs Stereogranimator - view more at http://stereo.nypl.org/gallery/index
GIF made with the NYPL Labs Stereogranimator

 

January 31st, 2012 | Art & Money, copyright, copyright and fair use, Law as a reflection of its society, legal madness | 1 comment

The Beach Boys: Villains, just see what you’ve done.

One of the oddest points to get across to non-lawyers, lawyers-to-be, and even many lawyers is that what the law prescribes and what actually happens are 2 entirely different things and that it is as crucial to being a good lawyer to understand what actually happens and why  as it is to know the laws. It starts out pretty simply with beginning law students. The first time someone says, “But Read more

January 29th, 2012 | copyright, copyright and fair use, creativity, fun, legal history | Add your comment

Dickie Goodman & Bill Buchanan: The Flying Saucer — the first hit mashup and its legacy

Buchanan & Goodman – The Flying Saucer (Parts 1 & 2) (mp3) Chuck Miller on the first controversial hit recording using samples of other songs: [I]n June 1956, [Dickie] Goodman came up with an idea. “Bill Buchanan and I were writing some songs at the time,” said Goodman in a print interview, “trying to break into the business. We were sitting around and suddenly we got an idea. How would Read more

January 29th, 2012 | copyright, copyright and fair use, creativity, originality | Add your comment

Michalis Pichler: Statements on Appropriation (2009)

Michalis Pichler: Statements on Appropriation (2009)  1. if a book paraphrases one explicit historical or contemporary predecessor in title, style and/or content, this technique is what I would call a “greatest hit” 2. Maybe the belief that an appropriation is always a conscious strategic decision made by an author is just as naive as believing in an “original” author in the first place. 3. It appears to me, that the signature of Read more

 

January 29th, 2012 | fun | Add your comment

Saturday Night Mashup: Beatles — Revolution Number Nine

January 28th, 2012 | fun | Add your comment

Saturday Night Mashup: The Timelords/KLF — Doctorin’ the Tardis

January 27th, 2012 | copyright, copyright and fair use, fun | Add your comment

Friday Night Mashup: Kota Ezawa and Yves Klein: Into the Void

 

January 27th, 2012 | Legal News | Add your comment

In loving memory of an American classic

Kota Ezawa, Slide 2006

January 27th, 2012 | copyright, copyright and fair use | Add your comment

Another thought on stating artistic intentions

Everything that can be thought at all can be thought clearly. Everything that can be said at all can be said clearly. But not everything that can be thought can be said.

                                                           – Ludwig Wittengstein

January 27th, 2012 | Art & Money, copyright, copyright and fair use, legal interpretation, originality | Add your comment

Richard Prince doesn’t have to describe one of his paintings as a Rhino in Hot Pants Shouting, “Repent, Repent!” for it to be so.

Tom Waits on the “meanings” of his songs: If you break open a song, you’ll find the eggs of other songs. Misunderstandings are really kind of an epidemic and acceptable. I think it’s about one thing, but someone else will say, ‘That song is kind of a rhino in hot pants on a burnt rocking horse with a lariat shouting, “Repent, repent!” I think that’s great. Why do I bring Read more

 

January 26th, 2012 | Art & Money, copyright, copyright and fair use, Law as a reflection of its society, Legal education, technology and law | Add your comment

Joy Garnett Lectures on Painting, Mass Media, and the Art of Fair Use

January 26th, 2012 | Art & Money, art law, copyright, copyright and fair use | 1 comment

What did Jackson Pollock intend when he painted Lavender Mist? Cariou v. Prince, and the importance of scripting the artist’s words.

Patrick Cariou’s lawyers have filed their brief (embedded below) in opposition to Richard Prince’s appeal of the decision holding that Prince’s appropriation’s of Cariou’s photographs constituted copyright infringement. Writing in artnet, Rachel Corbett explains, among other things, that Cariou’s legal team is banking largely on the claim that Prince’s work failed to comment on or satirize Cariou’s photographs — a common objection against applying the fair use exception to copyright law. Read more

January 25th, 2012 | creativity, fun | Add your comment

Part home, part musical instrument — NOLA’s Music Box

From NPR.org, In The Music Box, New Orleans Residents Hear Hope: When Hurricane Katrina hit New Orleans in 2005, it left behind a city full of destroyed homes. Despite ongoing rebuilding efforts, thousands of blighted properties remain. Now, a group of artists is creating a structure that is part home, part musical instrument and part inspiration of what can be made of these damaged properties. The Music Box is a small Read more

 

January 25th, 2012 | Art & Money, copyright, copyright and fair use, Free Speech, Law as a reflection of its society, problem solving, technology and law | Add your comment

The motion picture and music industries won’t give up trying to protect their money-making models even if they are obsolete.

Bill McGeveran in the Guardian makes clear that the film and music industries aren’t going to go away, but that there are ways to to address legitimate copyright concerns without PIPA and SOPA’s utter inadequacies: At the end of a Hollywood blockbuster, when the vanquished villain declares that he should have won and that we haven’t seen the last of him, we all know what it means: the sequel is Read more

January 25th, 2012 | creativity, innovation, originality, problem solving, technology and law | Add your comment

Building knowledge in the digital age; the transition continues — science this time.

I have made the point on this blog that the digitization of information and the internet have made the old ways of doing business with information (be it entertainment, news, science, or art) obsolete and that efforts to force the new media into legal forms that evolved with the ways businesses had organized the old technologies are doomed to failure or to killing the innovation those laws are supposed to Read more

January 23rd, 2012 | Art & Money, copyright, copyright and fair use, Law as a reflection of its society, legal madness, technology and law | Add your comment

Clay Shirky on why SOPA & PIPA won’t go away: the old media companies want to make it too expensive for you (artist, consumer, teacher, etc.) to use copies even in legitimate ways

 

January 21st, 2012 | fun | Add your comment

Saturday Night’s Music Mashup: Kota Ezawa – “Beatles: California Über Alles”

January 21st, 2012 | fun | Add your comment

Saturday Night at the Mashup Movies: Negativland, “No Other Possibility”